What makes you happy ?

Keith Fenn removes her clothes and rapes her.
Darren Wright takes her home and assaults her.

Keith Fenn will be free in 8 weeks.
Darren Wright is free already.

The girl was 10.

Judge Julian Hall said this was most difficult decision he had ever made but she looked 16 and was dressed provocatively.

This is the same judge that told a paedophile to buy his victim a bike.

Keith Fenn and Darren Wright deserve to have real justice meted out to them in a prolonged and painful way. They are paedophiles now - so where do they live?

If Judge Julian Hall has no problems with sex offenders that actually says so much about him and his attitudes. It’s not the law at fault here. It’s him. Maybe he thinks of little girls as sex objects too if he finds nothing wrong with it.
If the politicians want to restore faith in justice then he is the ideal sacrifice. Okay so no-one will believe a thing the politicians say but at least it’ll get this sex crime lover off the bench.
If his wife were mugged and battered would he accept the defence that “she looked rich” ? I doubt it, but why not?

No-one had the right to do that regardless of how a girl was or was not dressed. For them to do that renders them beneath contempt but for someone to say that it was okay just legitimised that behaviour for all other sex offenders and those that will hope he presides over their trial.

The sentences should be hugely increased - they have taken something away from the rest of her life - but Judge Julian Hall should be sacked. He hasn’t got a single bloody clue.

I have two daughters. I also have a view :) BBC Story

The High Court was told that Mrs Axon, 50, regretted undergoing a termination herself 20 years ago which caused her “guilt, shame and depression”.

Never ever impose your guilt and negative feelings on others. You will make out that it is for their benefit - you lie. It is trying to make you feel better about you. It’s ego. Don’t.

“It is incongruous to me that I am required to have to consent to my daughter having her belly button pierced while she can have an abortion without me even knowing.”

If a girl under 16 has not only got pregnant (which would indicate some sort of parental failure already) but has also then taken herself to the GP or an Advisory Clinic, and then discussed and agreed to a termination, then maybe they do not want you to know ? They will have been scared - yet not turned to you. That says a lot more about you than it does them.

“Her contention is much more modest. She merely says that as a matter of law she has the right to be notified - in shorthand, the case is about ‘the right to know’.”

Crap crap crap - she’d then run screaming to the courts to stop it saying that the daughter did not know what she had consented to. How about “Telling you after” - but that wouldn’t be good enough would it ?

Why is it that when parents say JUMP kids should do as they are told but when kids say LOOK they know nothing and must be told the error of their ways ?

The current guidelines infringed her parental rights under the European Convention on Human Rights, he told the judge.

I am sick and tired of this Human Rights rubbish. Aren’t you ??

Mrs Axon said she believed parents should be involved because “difficult discussions strengthen family life”.

I shall reveal the real meaning: “Mrs Axon said she thought her children should do as she said, not as she did and there would be hell to pay if they disagreed”.

The guidance deprived parents of the opportunity to advise their children and the child herself of the benefit of such advice, he added.

See that word in there ? advise. Implies discussion, agreeing to disagree. So the girl listens, talks and says “I’m keeping the child” - Mother agrees because child has seen the error of their ways and has consented to the pregnancy. But if the girl listens, talks and says “It’s going” then all of a sudden the child is incapable of rational thought and the full weight of the Law would be brought to bear by the mother. Can’t win can she - you really are determined to wreck her life even more aren’t you ?

From The Telegraph:

Mrs Axon stresses that her own teenage daughters Joy, 15, and Amber, 13, have not sought abortions and that she is bringing the case “as a matter of principle”.

Ahh……. this is one of those “I wannabe in the papers” things isn’t it ?

Mrs Axon - do not impose your views on me and mine. I won’t accept it from Tom “improving the Human Condition with every shiny-white smile” Cruise, so I’ll be damned if I’m taking it from you.

“You don’t know the history of psychiatry. I do,” says the shortarse. What utter garbage. Tom Cruise knows no more about the history of psychiatry than I do the personal history of a penguin living in a zoo anywhere. That guy is full of crap on this issue and people like him should just STFU about things which in their cossetted bloody lives they have not come across or had to endure. Scientology is garbage, trash, useless and a complete fiction dreamt up by a bloke who needed psychiatric medication ffs. Tom Cruise ? bullshit merchant.