I’ve used a PC for years, I’ve used a Mac mini for a couple of months.
This is the last mac/pc post I’m writing and at the end is a decision of sorts.
The path to that choice starts here:
Browser: Firefox (win) / Optimised Firefox (mac)
The off the shelf FF on Windows works smooth and fast. The same on the mac is like pouring treacle on a frosty morning. Once I had the optimised build, no such problems, very nice indeed. This is a draw – albeit one that Windows should actually have won.
Email: Thunderbird for both
A draw (though Charamel does look nicer…..)
Feeds: FeedDemon (win) / Vienna or Netnewswire Lite or Netnewswire paid
NNW Lite is okay but lacks the feed display I like. Vienna similarly. NNW is good but FD beats them all. It has the featureset and the looks. I’ve bought NNW. [Windows+1]
FTP: Filezilla (win) / Transmit (mac)
Transmit just hammers every client I’ve ever used. It is excellent. Love it. Bought it. [OS X +1]
IM: Trillian (win) / Adium (mac)
Functionally not a lot of difference given how I use them. Draw.
IRC: X-Chat for both. Draw (I tried Colloquy, didn’t like it)
Text Editors: Jujuedit/UltraEdit (win) / Smultron (mac)
I like jujuedit because it’s fast and can handle huge files. I like UE because it can ftp edit and has (basic) shell all in 1 app. I like Smultron because of it’s highlighting and seamless integration with Transmit.
Smultron is slower to open though. I prefer quicker to open. I’m sure Textedit or BBedit or TextWrangler will be mentioned and I’ll probably take them for a long run soon. Right now though Windows wins this one [Windows +1]
Clipboard: Evernote (win) / nothing comes close (mac)
I have looked, Lifehacker has had posts on note taking (here is one), WWD had a thread, Slacker Manager too. I love Evernote. It is a superb piece of code for the PC and one I would happily buy – yet they give it away for free. The mac has nothing as good for free. Sure it might have things that do more but what I wanted was the functionality not the adornments. Windows wins. [Windows +1]
Music: Winamp (win) / iTunes (mac)
I’m not saying it all again. [Windows +1]
Images: I have not tried anything on the mac. That said I have found all the Win apps to be not that great and I don’t think iPhoto can fill the gap.
Video: VLC on both. Draw
So that’s Windows 4, OS X 1.
Maybe that score is unfair though. Maybe I have yet to discover the programs that work for me, after all, I’ve had a couple of years start at least.
Eyecandy
1 – Hardware. Anyone who buys a computer just because it looks nice wants their head felt. If it more than does the job AND it looks good then fine. And so far I’m talking about the actual machine. Small white box, large black box. Small white box has 2 games on it and various bits around it so I can’t see it. Sat where I am I can see some of the black box near my left knee. So machine beauty does not come into it.
2 – OS. OS X is designed for the one setup. It damn well should look good. XP is meant to work on many many setups so looking good is harder – but with the Zune theme it works for me.
3 – Apps. Again, OS X apps have a 100% guarantee of environment, Windows apps do not. While the icons look nice in OS X it’s what they actually do that matters (see above).
Uptime
My PC has been rebooted less than the mini in the last 2 weeks.
Windows NT Air
Just like Windows Air, but costs more, uses much bigger planes, and takes out all the other aircraft within a 40-mile radius when it explodes.
My XP is stable. It runs and runs well. No bloat, nothing unneeded going on. So the ‘Windows crashes’ stuff doesn’t apply here. XP also takes less time to boot from cold than the mini.
Money
I like freeware. Not just OSS but also real freeware. On my PC I have very little non-freeware. I have looked for Mac freeware and I find less. The costs involved are small but they are still costs, they still add up. This factor isn’t a huge one but it still needs to be considered.
But can I work with the mini?
Yes. I don’t feel I can work quite as fast in Firefox but once I get a few more shortcuts sorted my speed increase in other apps may help negate that.
Does it feel better? Yes and no. Yes in that the system feels more ‘joined up’ but again with one common spec it should. No in that I don’t feel there are places where I can tinker.
Mac Airline.
All the stewards, stewardesses, captains, baggage handlers, and ticket agents look the same, act the same, and talk the same. Every time you ask questions about details, you are told you don’t need to know, don’t want to know, and would you please return to your seat and watch the movie.
I still find the launch speed of programs very slow (something that no-one has yet been able to explain) (see blockquote above).
It’s taken me quite some time to both get Windows working how I want, to know what the essential tools are and to get the programs which work and do not irritate. So when coming to the mac I was swapping an environment where I was good because of experience to one where I needed to learn. So I was bound to get annoyed and frustrated. This was accentuated by the ringing in my ears that Macs are intuitive, wonderful, bug-free, virus-free and are totally reliable. (When I went to Mexico I gave my girls complete freedom to the mini. I had nothing invested in it so said they could do what they wanted. They had root access. They disliked it.) I do not find it intuitive (click on item then click on it’s name to rename it? Weird) The blockquote above? I find that restricting. Whatever – this isn’t an anti-mac rant. The frustration continues but more because I can’t find the programs that I want. The puzzles I have yet to solve will be posted once I give up.
What would I buy?
This is the tricky bit and it’s one I’m still to an extent struggling with. I’m not assuming money is no object because we’d all have 2 machines then to get the best for apps and games. I’m thinking about what I would do if I could only get 1.
Desktop. It would be a PC. If I can only have one then I want to be able to play games and make the most of the freeware. It’s also the cheaper option.
Laptop. It would be a Mac. But it won’t – because of cost. D’s laptop (a good one too) was £600 ($1200) and that’s it – no more money needed. A (basic) Macbook is £750 ($1500) then add more (£60/$120) for the memory. There is a 30% cost increase for not necessarily a better lifespan. [Edit: I'm not saying the Macbook is not worth it. I'm referring to the handing over of more money. The act of parting with cash that could be spent elsewhere]
And ditch the pc and use Parallels? Why? Right now I have full-screen full-effect Dreamfall on the PC and a screen of work here. Two machines, two workloads at exactly the same time.
I like the mac. Since switching I have spent less than a couple of hours on the PC working which when you consider the amount of time online I do then less than 120 minutes is nothing. Am I totally seduced by it? No. Do I think I could grow to like it a lot? Yes, certainly.
Is the mac better? No. I’ve said it before – it’s a computer. A means to an end. A tool. And a tool is only as good as the person using it. Microsoft are as good/bad as Apple.
But there.. that’s my last mini v pc post.
The mini is for all things work, the pc for gaming and music.
[If OS's were airlines]
Note: Fanboy comments run the risk of being deleted or ridiculed.