What makes you happy ?

This domain just stole my content.

Whois:
Domain Name:HOWSHITWORKS.ORG
Created On:23-Apr-2007 05:12:04 UTC
Last Updated On:18-Oct-2007 16:37:37 UTC
Expiration Date:23-Apr-2008 05:12:04 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)
Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:GODA-030591892
Registrant Name:Developer Hut Inc Developer Hut Inc
Registrant Organization:Developer Hut Inc
Registrant Street1:P.O Box 3743
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Idaho Falls
Registrant State/Province:Idaho
Registrant Postal Code:83403-3743
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.2087579111

Hosted at http://hostingloser.com who have no sitemap, no contact, no aup / tos.
So the loser that steal anyone’s blog content hide away in the State of Idaho.
They have http://www.buyblogcomments.com, they sell ads and have ads on stolen blog content.

Google ‘developer hut inc’.

And the jerk behind this? The man who steals? The man who takes the work of others to make himself money? Jon Waraas. Behold – a thief.

http://www.jonwaraas.com/who-is-jon-waraas/

–

Update 12 Dec.
I find http://growablog.com/ as part of my work. Why do I find it? It’s spamming. Spamming trackbacks.
And guess who it is?

Registrant:
Developer Hut Inc
P.O Box 3743
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403-3743
United States

Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: GROWABLOG.COM
Created on: 02-Jun-07
Expires on: 02-Jun-08
Last Updated on: 18-Oct-07

Administrative Contact:
Developer Hut Inc, Developer Hut Inc developerhut@gmail.com
Developer Hut Inc
P.O Box 3743
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403-3743
United States
2087579111 Fax –

It’s that thief Jon Warass again. He is stealing from every blog he can scrape.
Oh yes, and I did email him to ask him to stop stealing. His response was that I got 2 free links from him. Well hell yes, that’s just great eh? He’s still Jon Waraas – thief

Update again – Tuesday 24 March 2009

Developer Hut, Inc.
P.O Box 3743
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83403-3743
United States
1-208-608-5133

Dear Mark R,
It has come to our attention that your Dec. 11, 2007 blog posting on tamba2.org.uk, “Developer Hut aka Jon Warass steals your blog content,” is making false and deceptive claims that are or may be misleading customers about Developer Hut, Inc. We request that you immediately cease and desist from continuing to make any such claims. We further request that you immediately remove such claims from your website, including Web site pages.

Developer Hut, Inc. is Internet Marketing company based out of Idaho Falls, Idaho. Since 2006 we have been offering web based advertisement to company’s looking to increase there SEO ranking. Developer Hut, Inc. is widely recognized for our quality seo services and has a well-deserved reputation of providing our customers quality seo link building. This reputation has been harmed, and will continue to be harmed, by any and all false and deceptive claims that tamba2.org.uk has made.

In light of the foregoing, we request that you immediately cease and desist from continuing to make any false, deceptive or misleading claims, statements, assertions or representations — whether explicit or implicit — regarding Developer Hut, Inc. We further request that you immediately remove all such claims from all your website, whether in written, electronic, verbal, visual or audio form, including, but not limited to, advertisements, emails, Web site materials, press releases, announcements and correspondence.

If you fail to take this requested action within 2 business days, Developer Hut, Inc. will have no choice but to pursue all available legal remedies against you, Mark R.

You will also be receiving a certified cease and desist letter sent to your whois address. If you have any questions or would like to talk to our lawyer then please set up a time for a conference call. Your full cooperation in this matter is appreciated.

Sincerely,
Developer Hut, Inc.

The fishing industry has warned it faces ruin because fish caught after quotas are exceeded have to be dumped. BBC

So they want to raise their quotas so they don’t have to throw their fish away. And that of course will still decimate stocks and they will face ruin because they will then still catch over-quota so they can bring back the exact quota. Which part of ‘facing ruin’ do these fisherman not understand?

Oliver Knowles, a campaigner for Greenpeace, also believes quotas are not working for the UK’s mixed fisheries. He says the only answer is to stop fishing altogether in 40% of the world’s oceans.

My actual standpoint: All fishing is cruel. Be that “Hey I caught one this big” ripping the hook out of it’s face and tossing it back into the water or the slow drowning in a net. Sport? In as much as hare-coursing, fox-hunting and badger-baiting.

So the brilliant file “An Inconvenient Truth” can be seen in schools. Apart from the last few minutes when it’s a case of USA! USA! it’s a damn fine film and one that all kids should see.
One guy thought different and challenged the Government. He won – though it can still be seen.

Mr Dimmock said: “I am elated with today’s result, but still disappointed that the film is able to be shown in schools.
“If it was not for the case brought by myself, our young people would still be being indoctrinated with this political spin.”

I sincerely hope you are not bringing your kids as having to belong to any faith – that’s called indoctrination.

And if you believe global warming is “political spin” then you need to get a grip.

We were going to have chicken fajitas tonight. We’d bought the chicken, got the ‘yellow box’ of ‘ingredients’ and I was quite looking forward to it. But for what may seem an arbitrary reason we decided not to have the chicken tonight. We thought instead we would have it tomorrow. Possibly the next day. I thought it was just putting it back some time, or delaying it. But no.
It is much more serious than that.
It’s censorship.

The BBC has postponed the broadcast of a story about western hostages being executed in Iraq as concern grows for missing BBC journalist Alan Johnston.

The author, Hanif Kureishi, criticised the decision as censorship, saying: “It all seems rather arbitrary”.

“It seems to me that as a journalist, he would be against censorship,” he told the Guardian newspaper.

So postponed=censorship. I’m sure the journalist concerned would be against censorship – after all, he was in a war zone – but to equate the delaying of a piece of fiction to the real life dangers of a man and then to pretend it’s “censorship” is ludicrous.

Mr Kuresihi – get a grip and stop being an complete idiot. And apologise.

The BBC has an article about Perez Hilton:

It’s a long article. It’s not that bad either. But there is no link at all to his site. Why?
Why are the BBC describing someone, talking about showbiz, talking about attitude and talking directly about the website and then not linking to it? They already have a disclaimer on all external site links but this story doesn’t even get that link! Somewhere in the BBC some very sheltered little person decided to not have that link. Idiot.

http://perezhilton.com

Chrysler’s chief economist Van Jolissaint has launched a fierce attack on “quasi-hysterical Europeans” and their “Chicken Little” attitudes to global warming.

Mr Jolissant, a Chrysler veteran who was recently appointed the chief economist for the German-US DaimlerChrysler Group……….[said] he had been shocked by the absurdity of European attitudes towards global warming.In response to a question from the floor, he said that global warming was a far-off risk whose magnitude was uncertain.

and which fools fell into line?

Neither Ford’s chief economist Ellen Hughes-Cromwick, nor General Motors’ chief economist Mustafa Mohatarem, who were on the panel with Mr Jolissaint, questioned his assertion.

FFS. Even GWB has a clue about global warming.

Mr Jolissant is quite obviously a man with his head far far up his corporate ass.

So the head of the Press Complaints Commission wants blogs to have a voluntary code of conduct. So if I do not “volunteer” I do not have to abide?
And let’s say I do volunteer. Let’s say I agree to whatever such nonsense would say.
And let’s say the Dr Rowan Williams has an issue with me calling him a blackmailer.
I will respond in the same way the Press does.

With a tiny little entry buried somewhere completely unnoticeable on this domain. After all, if it’s good enough for the mainstream press why should I act any different?

Oh yes – it’s a pathetic idea too. Sheer bloody nonsense.
Selected quotes from that link:

“We’re not in favour of regulating the internet. The flow of information should not by regulated by any government.”

No, but you want to do it instead.

Former Downing Street spin doctor Alastair Campbell …….added that “some of the most offensive stuff” comes from them [blogs].

Hey – you hand out the lead, so why are you surprised when people make bullets?

Mr Toulmin described the phrases “free speech” and “free press” as relative terms because views expressed on the internet are still governed by laws such as libel and data protection.

So my understanding of that is this: “There is no free speech on the internet because of existing laws” and the addition to that is “and now we want a code too“. So that makes free speech even less relative doesn’t it? Less free. More regulated. Censored.

And he thinks people will welcome this? Idiot.

Seems that Tom wants the domain tomcruise.com – but someone else has it. Oh dear :) Maybe I should register tomcruiseisanutter, or themadnessoftomcruise or toothytomcruise ….

Author : BARRY TEBB (IP: 213.48.145.110 , 213-48-145-110.cro.cvx.blueyonder.co.uk)
E-mail : barry.tebb@blueyonder.co.uk
URI :
Whois : http://ws.arin.net/cgi-bin/whois.pl?queryinput=213.48.145.110
Comment:
WHERE IS MY HEWITT PIECE PLERASE?

The goofball above left a very long rant about someone called ‘HEWITT’ (note, not ‘Hewitt’) some time ago. It was very long and all in capitals. I really dislike people who overuse their capslock key to the point it breaks. I deleted it. He posted something along the lines of “I wrote it bring it back” so I deleted that too. Then another. Now the above – which has also been deleted.

Mr TEBB (if indeed this is your name)
Just because there is the ability for you to leave comments does not impose on me any obligation to display your ranting garbage. You may say what you want, you may believe what you want – but do not expect me to allow you to use this space as a platform for your paranoia. I do not believe any blogger would permit your shouting to stay on their blog and I am no different. I would suggest that you get your own blog but somehow I don’t feel you want your conspiracy theories to be left in a single blog do you? You want to wander round blogs scattering your maniacal meanderings and pointless drivel in the vain hope that someone may read it and join you on this ‘castles in the air’ crusade. Get a grip you drooling fool – we don’t want you to do this – I bet you have it all written in Word or something (scrub that, it’ll be Notepad eh?) so you can copy and paste (you can do that?). What would the term for that be? Rant’n'Run? or RANTNRUN? Why is it that you and fellow mouth-foamers cannot see that the way to persuade us is by discussion, by presenting facts, arguing carefully and by being open to the opinions of others instead of your drive-by (surf-by?) (click-by?) capital assaults? Are you incapable of learning? Is your forehead so low you have nothing to scratch as you try to master the intricacies of basic communication? How are the scabs on the knuckles anyway? I would email you this response but I’m not sure I could type slowly enough. barry.tebb@blueyonder.co.uk – your presence here is unwelcome. Anything and everything you write will be deleted. Off you go now…..
(and the HEWITT in question? I haven’t a clue)

Cruise loses the plot. AGAIN

“Very nutritious. I’m gonna eat the cord and the placenta right there.”

At what point does the diminutive idiot get too mad even for the Scientologists? (Answer: when he has no more money to fund their ego-trips)

It’s not the eating of the placenta – though apparently it would be better cooked – it’s the fact he’s boasting of doing it right there. What’s he going to do? Chomp through the cord himself? And has he any idea just how much there is? It’s not insubstantial – maybe he’s after a ‘Cool Hand Tom’ label.. Does he even care what his other half thinks? But then she’s now a Stepford Wife, frigging lunatic Scientologist so she’ll do what she is told by The Cult won’t she.

Tom Cruise – Saving the world with every bloody grin.