Judge Julian Hall does not see sex offences as crimes
16:51 Monday 25 Jun 07
Keith Fenn removes her clothes and rapes her.
Darren Wright takes her home and assaults her.
Keith Fenn will be free in 8 weeks.
Darren Wright is free already.
The girl was 10.
Judge Julian Hall said this was most difficult decision he had ever made but she looked 16 and was dressed provocatively.
This is the same judge that told a paedophile to buy his victim a bike.
Keith Fenn and Darren Wright deserve to have real justice meted out to them in a prolonged and painful way. They are paedophiles now - so where do they live?
If Judge Julian Hall has no problems with sex offenders that actually says so much about him and his attitudes. It’s not the law at fault here. It’s him. Maybe he thinks of little girls as sex objects too if he finds nothing wrong with it.
If the politicians want to restore faith in justice then he is the ideal sacrifice. Okay so no-one will believe a thing the politicians say but at least it’ll get this sex crime lover off the bench.
If his wife were mugged and battered would he accept the defence that “she looked rich” ? I doubt it, but why not?
No-one had the right to do that regardless of how a girl was or was not dressed. For them to do that renders them beneath contempt but for someone to say that it was okay just legitimised that behaviour for all other sex offenders and those that will hope he presides over their trial.
The sentences should be hugely increased - they have taken something away from the rest of her life - but Judge Julian Hall should be sacked. He hasn’t got a single bloody clue.
