Comments on: Judge Julian Hall does not see sex offences as crimes

By: Layla

Layla — Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:13:30 +0000

I really really feel sick in my stomach, I really just can’t stand men.

The fact that they don’t even see anything wrong with this, that they are/should be allowed to do this. I want nothing to do with them.

By: NVO

NVO — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:07:04 +0000

Dont worry he’s on my list.

Join the National Vigilante Organisation

Do something about the scum that walks our streets.

The police are pathetic and with judges like this …

Justice must be served

Make a difference do it now the more of us there are the more ‘scumbags’ we can rid this world of.

NVO

By: JustMe

JustMe — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:00:59 +0000

Nicole is dead on,children as young as 8 feel the desire of sex,its part of every1,just most people don’t want to admit it as natural

By: JustMe

JustMe — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:54:00 +0000

Most sex offenders are not horrible,its overkill and once accussed or found guilty they r ruined for life,there is way to much bias against them,usually no1 has anything positive to say,they r a victim also and trapped by the laws and severe punishments,just wait sooner or later some1 u know will be accussed and get the same treatment ,some1 u love,youre son,youre grandchild, rehab is the only answer to change,not prison…….its overkill…2,000 sex offenders and maybe 10 of them r truly dangerous,but all the others pay a high price,when no violence is involved

By: JustMe

JustMe — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:45:59 +0000

I think the judge made a few comments that he shouldn’t of ,but i believe the judge is trying to make a point also,he believes,and probably is aware and knows that if a sex offender is going to ever have a chance to become a good law abideing citizen,rehabitation is what is needed not prison,nothing in prison helps any1,its just a lock up,and overtime it mentally makes you suffer far more then the victim usually does ,unless their was continued acts of sex against the victim or physical violence,in that case u r a pedophile,what society doesn’t relize is ,the states tell them sex offenders get treatment but thats not really true……1,000 sex offenders and maybe 300 get the option cause the states r unwilling to pay for it,and if u have a 2nd offense against u, u don’t get treatment,when u r in prison u don’t get any treatment until about 18 months b4 youre release,by then if u have already spent over 8 yrs in prison what good is it,u need that right away,every sex offender needs treatment ,every 1 of them,what good does it do or help them or society to be a safer place if it isn’t done right,people r being fooled about rehab,and most offences r by juveniles who r just being a normal run of the mill boy like girl issue,most juveniles don’t give it a 2nd thought that when a girl like them,and they like her ,age means nothing to them,4 or 5 years apart, i was 17 when i got married my husband 21,we had sex b4 that,many many people past years have,imagine all the perverts we r.r lifes totally ruined if it happened in this day and age,i’m not for the sex offender,but all victims r not totally innocent either,it is breaking down alot of family stuctures and revenge never helps,sex offenders have it really bad for the most part,there lifes r ruined also,their families lifes r ruined,the victims life ruined in some cases but only if it is violent in my opinion,i was molested 2x’s as a child non violent and it didn’t really affect me,if it had been violent and repeated by the same person i am sure it would of affected me,even the accused has feelings ,and the sex laws r cruel,i am all for good rehab and not revenge

By: Amy's Nerga Villas

Amy's Nerga Villas — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:11:21 +0000

This Julian Hall need to be off the bench and quick smart.. Having recently passed A Level in Criminology I find it really hard to understand how this FOOL can be written about in national papers for the WRONG way he is punishing offender’s (or not punishing) and still be allowed to keep his job. The whole world is having difficulty trying to maintain public order, respect and enforce the law, yet the punishments do NOT fit the crime these Horrible offenders are continuing to commit. I’m not saying bring back the old style of punishment but at least these monsters paid for the crimes they committed. If anyone knows how to get this twit off the bench let me know. Thanks.

By: Sam

Sam — Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:56:33 +0000

@Michael

Your an idiot, and any man who cant distinguish between a girl of 10 and 16 are also idiots along with this pillock Judge Hall.

By: Peter Niedermann

Peter Niedermann — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 22:42:36 +0000

Julian Hall – I think, this man is not only mad, he is simply perverse. He should be forced to feel what the girl felt: one should stuff his mouth with his peruke and rape him a nice huge dildo. I’d like to know how he would think afterwards.

By: Les

Les — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:02:06 +0000

Mark, John and Alethea. I agree. If this jusge persistently fails to apply sentencing guidelines to the child sex offences that come before him, he will ruin public confidence in the judiciary.

Might I suggest you express your support to Kidscape, and to The Rt Hon Mike Penning MP, who both seem to be very concerned about the judge. You could also express your disapproval to the Justice minister, his boss.

There’s a new Act of Parliament called The Serious Crime Act 2007. Part 2 of the act deals with encouraging and assisting crime. Wouldn’t it be ironic if the first person charged with “Encouraging crime by failing to take reasonable steps to carry out a duty” was a judge?

Alethea, I know this is not what you want to hear but, if you stop your little girl going out of the house in a mini skirt, she’ll just change her clothes at her friend’s house. You’ll simply alienate her by being restrictive. It is far better to teach her the apropriate way to respond to sexual advances, (and why), and try to engage her with some of those groups that provide things for kids to do like Guides etc.

By: Mark

Mark — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:03:55 +0000

And here the paedophile lover goes again At what point does he let someone off who then repeats their offence and damages another life. Once would be too many. That sad little man needs sacking.