<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/</link>
	<description>Eclectic.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-almost-beta</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-196529</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-196529</guid>
		<description>I found a lot useful info. Thanks.A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a lot useful info. Thanks.A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasons to not upgrade to WordPress 2.0 from 1.5.2 &#124; How to Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons to not upgrade to WordPress 2.0 from 1.5.2 &#124; How to Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>[...] Tamba2, who actually wrote one of the upgrade guides, is actually NOT upgrading himself and posts his reasoning here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tamba2, who actually wrote one of the upgrade guides, is actually NOT upgrading himself and posts his reasoning here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All That Jazz at WordPress.ch</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6990</link>
		<dc:creator>All That Jazz at WordPress.ch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6990</guid>
		<description>[...] Oublions pour un moment qu&#8217;il s&#8217;agit probablement d&#8217;un des lancements les plus laborieux d&#8217;une nouvelle version de WordPress ÃƒÂ  ce jour, et profitons un peu de la musique du grand Duke pendant les derniers jours de vacances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oublions pour un moment qu&#8217;il s&#8217;agit probablement d&#8217;un des lancements les plus laborieux d&#8217;une nouvelle version de WordPress ÃƒÂ  ce jour, et profitons un peu de la musique du grand Duke pendant les derniers jours de vacances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fightingfriends &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wordpress 2.0 and a Possible Redesign</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6977</link>
		<dc:creator>Fightingfriends &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wordpress 2.0 and a Possible Redesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6977</guid>
		<description>[...] Although it&#8217;s been out for almost a week, Wordpress 2.0 is finally, officially announced. I&#8217;ve already read and commented so much about why I&#8217;m not upgrading (at least not for a while) that I can&#8217;t really be bothered explaining the reasons again. There has been a lot of major WP community people not upgrading and it&#8217;s caused a little bit of an uproar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although it&#8217;s been out for almost a week, Wordpress 2.0 is finally, officially announced. I&#8217;ve already read and commented so much about why I&#8217;m not upgrading (at least not for a while) that I can&#8217;t really be bothered explaining the reasons again. There has been a lot of major WP community people not upgrading and it&#8217;s caused a little bit of an uproar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBisch</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6972</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6972</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WordPress 2.0.... Who Cares?&lt;/strong&gt;

The software I use for this blog is called WordPressÃ‚â€¦ for those of you who are familiar with WordPress, you probably know that version 2.0 came out not too long ago. I havenÃ‚â€™t upgraded to 2.0 yet, and the other day Owen wanted to know why.

I haven...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WordPress 2.0&#8230;. Who Cares?</strong></p>
<p>The software I use for this blog is called WordPressÃ‚â€¦ for those of you who are familiar with WordPress, you probably know that version 2.0 came out not too long ago. I havenÃ‚â€™t upgraded to 2.0 yet, and the other day Owen wanted to know why.</p>
<p>I haven&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k:blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wp2</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6969</link>
		<dc:creator>k:blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wp2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6969</guid>
		<description>[...] ahogy az vÃƒÂ¡rhatÃƒÂ³ volt fellÃƒÂ¡ngoltak a vitÃƒÂ¡k a wordpress 2.0 kapcsÃƒÂ¡n [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. a rÃƒÂ©gi 1.5.x felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³knak nem jelentenek semmit az ÃƒÂºj funkciÃƒÂ³k. nyilvÃƒÂ¡nvalÃƒÂ³, hogy a cÃƒÂ©l inkÃƒÂ¡bb a nyitÃƒÂ¡s az ÃƒÂºj felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³khoz ÃƒÂ©s nem a rÃƒÂ©giek kiszolgÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ¡sa. ezt tÃƒÂ¶bben is nehezen ÃƒÂ©lik meg ÃƒÂ©s mÃƒÂ¡r szÃƒÂ¼lettek is segÃƒÂ©dprogramok, amelyekkel downgradelni lehet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ahogy az vÃƒÂ¡rhatÃƒÂ³ volt fellÃƒÂ¡ngoltak a vitÃƒÂ¡k a wordpress 2.0 kapcsÃƒÂ¡n [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. a rÃƒÂ©gi 1.5.x felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³knak nem jelentenek semmit az ÃƒÂºj funkciÃƒÂ³k. nyilvÃƒÂ¡nvalÃƒÂ³, hogy a cÃƒÂ©l inkÃƒÂ¡bb a nyitÃƒÂ¡s az ÃƒÂºj felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³khoz ÃƒÂ©s nem a rÃƒÂ©giek kiszolgÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ¡sa. ezt tÃƒÂ¶bben is nehezen ÃƒÂ©lik meg ÃƒÂ©s mÃƒÂ¡r szÃƒÂ¼lettek is segÃƒÂ©dprogramok, amelyekkel downgradelni lehet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memo</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6964</link>
		<dc:creator>Memo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6964</guid>
		<description>I'm going to use 2.0 for my new blog just because it's a new start, and I kinda like the add categories feature in the post screen.
I don't even see the WYSIWYG as it doesn't work in Opera. =)

That said, I think that Wordpress is suffering the same thing than Firefox: Popularity. Developers like that and start adding shiny things just to be even more popular, but most of it is useless fluff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to use 2.0 for my new blog just because it&#8217;s a new start, and I kinda like the add categories feature in the post screen.<br />
I don&#8217;t even see the WYSIWYG as it doesn&#8217;t work in Opera. =)</p>
<p>That said, I think that Wordpress is suffering the same thing than Firefox: Popularity. Developers like that and start adding shiny things just to be even more popular, but most of it is useless fluff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why If..Else has not been upgraded to WP2.0 - If..Else Log</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6963</link>
		<dc:creator>Why If..Else has not been upgraded to WP2.0 - If..Else Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6963</guid>
		<description>[...] I can see how this would be useful for many and tinymce is a fine choice. And whilst some would consider such to be bulk, it doesn't really bother me. It's not perfect and it's not for me, but it's optional so I turn it off. However, whilst I don't care in the least about it, it's not really a compelling reason for me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can see how this would be useful for many and tinymce is a fine choice. And whilst some would consider such to be bulk, it doesn&#8217;t really bother me. It&#8217;s not perfect and it&#8217;s not for me, but it&#8217;s optional so I turn it off. However, whilst I don&#8217;t care in the least about it, it&#8217;s not really a compelling reason for me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6961</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6961</guid>
		<description>Ok and SK2 is doing that thing where it always thinks I'm a bot again.

bah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok and SK2 is doing that thing where it always thinks I&#8217;m a bot again.</p>
<p>bah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/#comment-6960</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6960</guid>
		<description>I'm running 2.0, but mostly because I'm not too bothered. I also like the new admin screen, though some of the hidden options are annoying (too many clicks to do something now in some cases).

I agree about the WYSIWYG - It isn't essencial, and has caused a LOT of problems. However it IS nice to use more most posts - as long as those posts aren't about code, or have lots of images. It also drags the code quality down (align atrributes of imgs? Please.)

That minor thing aside - the code has improved a lot, but not visibly much. There are nicer tihngs for plugin authors in there, and it should be more stable, but it's still pretty slow running (especially the goddamn dashboard). Then again WP was never the fastest horse on the track, but it's usually up in the top few.

The WYSIWYG can be turned off - it reverts back to the quicktags - but it does seem rather bloated. They guys at TinyMCE have really worked to help that though.

I still don't feel its a 2.0 release though, more like a 1.7/8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running 2.0, but mostly because I&#8217;m not too bothered. I also like the new admin screen, though some of the hidden options are annoying (too many clicks to do something now in some cases).</p>
<p>I agree about the WYSIWYG - It isn&#8217;t essencial, and has caused a LOT of problems. However it IS nice to use more most posts - as long as those posts aren&#8217;t about code, or have lots of images. It also drags the code quality down (align atrributes of imgs? Please.)</p>
<p>That minor thing aside - the code has improved a lot, but not visibly much. There are nicer tihngs for plugin authors in there, and it should be more stable, but it&#8217;s still pretty slow running (especially the goddamn dashboard). Then again WP was never the fastest horse on the track, but it&#8217;s usually up in the top few.</p>
<p>The WYSIWYG can be turned off - it reverts back to the quicktags - but it does seem rather bloated. They guys at TinyMCE have really worked to help that though.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t feel its a 2.0 release though, more like a 1.7/8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
