<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/</link>
	<description>Eclectic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-196529</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-196529</guid>
		<description>I found a lot useful info. Thanks.A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found a lot useful info. Thanks.A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reasons to not upgrade to WordPress 2.0 from 1.5.2 &#124; How to Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons to not upgrade to WordPress 2.0 from 1.5.2 &#124; How to Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>[...] Tamba2, who actually wrote one of the upgrade guides, is actually NOT upgrading himself and posts his reasoning here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tamba2, who actually wrote one of the upgrade guides, is actually NOT upgrading himself and posts his reasoning here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: All That Jazz at WordPress.ch</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6990</link>
		<dc:creator>All That Jazz at WordPress.ch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6990</guid>
		<description>[...] Oublions pour un moment qu&#8217;il s&#8217;agit probablement d&#8217;un des lancements les plus laborieux d&#8217;une nouvelle version de WordPress ÃƒÂ  ce jour, et profitons un peu de la musique du grand Duke pendant les derniers jours de vacances. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oublions pour un moment qu&#8217;il s&#8217;agit probablement d&#8217;un des lancements les plus laborieux d&#8217;une nouvelle version de WordPress ÃƒÂ  ce jour, et profitons un peu de la musique du grand Duke pendant les derniers jours de vacances. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fightingfriends &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wordpress 2.0 and a Possible Redesign</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6977</link>
		<dc:creator>Fightingfriends &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wordpress 2.0 and a Possible Redesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 02:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6977</guid>
		<description>[...] Although it&#8217;s been out for almost a week, Wordpress 2.0 is finally, officially announced. I&#8217;ve already read and commented so much about why I&#8217;m not upgrading (at least not for a while) that I can&#8217;t really be bothered explaining the reasons again. There has been a lot of major WP community people not upgrading and it&#8217;s caused a little bit of an uproar. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Although it&#8217;s been out for almost a week, Wordpress 2.0 is finally, officially announced. I&#8217;ve already read and commented so much about why I&#8217;m not upgrading (at least not for a while) that I can&#8217;t really be bothered explaining the reasons again. There has been a lot of major WP community people not upgrading and it&#8217;s caused a little bit of an uproar. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBisch</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6972</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 19:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6972</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;WordPress 2.0.... Who Cares?&lt;/strong&gt;

The software I use for this blog is called WordPressÃ‚â€¦ for those of you who are familiar with WordPress, you probably know that version 2.0 came out not too long ago. I havenÃ‚â€™t upgraded to 2.0 yet, and the other day Owen wanted to know why.

I haven...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>WordPress 2.0&#8230;. Who Cares?</strong></p>
<p>The software I use for this blog is called WordPressÃ‚â€¦ for those of you who are familiar with WordPress, you probably know that version 2.0 came out not too long ago. I havenÃ‚â€™t upgraded to 2.0 yet, and the other day Owen wanted to know why.</p>
<p>I haven&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k:blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wp2</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6969</link>
		<dc:creator>k:blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wp2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6969</guid>
		<description>[...] ahogy az vÃƒÂ¡rhatÃƒÂ³ volt fellÃƒÂ¡ngoltak a vitÃƒÂ¡k a wordpress 2.0 kapcsÃƒÂ¡n [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. a rÃƒÂ©gi 1.5.x felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³knak nem jelentenek semmit az ÃƒÂºj funkciÃƒÂ³k. nyilvÃƒÂ¡nvalÃƒÂ³, hogy a cÃƒÂ©l inkÃƒÂ¡bb a nyitÃƒÂ¡s az ÃƒÂºj felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³khoz ÃƒÂ©s nem a rÃƒÂ©giek kiszolgÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ¡sa. ezt tÃƒÂ¶bben is nehezen ÃƒÂ©lik meg ÃƒÂ©s mÃƒÂ¡r szÃƒÂ¼lettek is segÃƒÂ©dprogramok, amelyekkel downgradelni lehet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ahogy az vÃƒÂ¡rhatÃƒÂ³ volt fellÃƒÂ¡ngoltak a vitÃƒÂ¡k a wordpress 2.0 kapcsÃƒÂ¡n [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. a rÃƒÂ©gi 1.5.x felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³knak nem jelentenek semmit az ÃƒÂºj funkciÃƒÂ³k. nyilvÃƒÂ¡nvalÃƒÂ³, hogy a cÃƒÂ©l inkÃƒÂ¡bb a nyitÃƒÂ¡s az ÃƒÂºj felhasznÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ³khoz ÃƒÂ©s nem a rÃƒÂ©giek kiszolgÃƒÂ¡lÃƒÂ¡sa. ezt tÃƒÂ¶bben is nehezen ÃƒÂ©lik meg ÃƒÂ©s mÃƒÂ¡r szÃƒÂ¼lettek is segÃƒÂ©dprogramok, amelyekkel downgradelni lehet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Memo</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6964</link>
		<dc:creator>Memo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 04:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6964</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to use 2.0 for my new blog just because it&#039;s a new start, and I kinda like the add categories feature in the post screen.
I don&#039;t even see the WYSIWYG as it doesn&#039;t work in Opera. =)

That said, I think that Wordpress is suffering the same thing than Firefox: Popularity. Developers like that and start adding shiny things just to be even more popular, but most of it is useless fluff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to use 2.0 for my new blog just because it&#8217;s a new start, and I kinda like the add categories feature in the post screen.<br />
I don&#8217;t even see the WYSIWYG as it doesn&#8217;t work in Opera. =)</p>
<p>That said, I think that Wordpress is suffering the same thing than Firefox: Popularity. Developers like that and start adding shiny things just to be even more popular, but most of it is useless fluff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why If..Else has not been upgraded to WP2.0 - If..Else Log</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6963</link>
		<dc:creator>Why If..Else has not been upgraded to WP2.0 - If..Else Log</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6963</guid>
		<description>[...] I can see how this would be useful for many and tinymce is a fine choice. And whilst some would consider such to be bulk, it doesn&#039;t really bother me. It&#039;s not perfect and it&#039;s not for me, but it&#039;s optional so I turn it off. However, whilst I don&#039;t care in the least about it, it&#039;s not really a compelling reason for me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I can see how this would be useful for many and tinymce is a fine choice. And whilst some would consider such to be bulk, it doesn&#8217;t really bother me. It&#8217;s not perfect and it&#8217;s not for me, but it&#8217;s optional so I turn it off. However, whilst I don&#8217;t care in the least about it, it&#8217;s not really a compelling reason for me. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6961</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6961</guid>
		<description>Ok and SK2 is doing that thing where it always thinks I&#039;m a bot again.

bah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok and SK2 is doing that thing where it always thinks I&#8217;m a bot again.</p>
<p>bah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/12/30/wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-6960</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/?p=2035#comment-6960</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m running 2.0, but mostly because I&#039;m not too bothered. I also like the new admin screen, though some of the hidden options are annoying (too many clicks to do something now in some cases).

I agree about the WYSIWYG - It isn&#039;t essencial, and has caused a LOT of problems. However it IS nice to use more most posts - as long as those posts aren&#039;t about code, or have lots of images. It also drags the code quality down (align atrributes of imgs? Please.)

That minor thing aside - the code has improved a lot, but not visibly much. There are nicer tihngs for plugin authors in there, and it should be more stable, but it&#039;s still pretty slow running (especially the goddamn dashboard). Then again WP was never the fastest horse on the track, but it&#039;s usually up in the top few.

The WYSIWYG can be turned off - it reverts back to the quicktags - but it does seem rather bloated. They guys at TinyMCE have really worked to help that though.

I still don&#039;t feel its a 2.0 release though, more like a 1.7/8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m running 2.0, but mostly because I&#8217;m not too bothered. I also like the new admin screen, though some of the hidden options are annoying (too many clicks to do something now in some cases).</p>
<p>I agree about the WYSIWYG &#8211; It isn&#8217;t essencial, and has caused a LOT of problems. However it IS nice to use more most posts &#8211; as long as those posts aren&#8217;t about code, or have lots of images. It also drags the code quality down (align atrributes of imgs? Please.)</p>
<p>That minor thing aside &#8211; the code has improved a lot, but not visibly much. There are nicer tihngs for plugin authors in there, and it should be more stable, but it&#8217;s still pretty slow running (especially the goddamn dashboard). Then again WP was never the fastest horse on the track, but it&#8217;s usually up in the top few.</p>
<p>The WYSIWYG can be turned off &#8211; it reverts back to the quicktags &#8211; but it does seem rather bloated. They guys at TinyMCE have really worked to help that though.</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t feel its a 2.0 release though, more like a 1.7/8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
