<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Catholic nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/29/more-catholic-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/29/more-catholic-nonsense/</link>
	<description>Eclectic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dino</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/29/more-catholic-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-6485</link>
		<dc:creator>dino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/29/more-catholic-nonsense/#comment-6485</guid>
		<description>The Catholic Church has had a theological problem with being gay for a long time. They can&#039;t come out and say that to be a homosexual is wrong as they preach that God makes us who we are. Therefore, if you are gay then God made you that way. I always thought they got around this issue by saying that gay sex was immoral. As with heterosexuality any sex outside marriage is a no-no so as gays can&#039;t get married then they&#039;re are fornicating and damned to hell. This meant they had the moral high ground without comprimising themselves and not appearing homophobic or whatever. This edict doesn&#039;t make sense in what it says but the reason why it has been released is equally bizarre.

I might be stirring the pot a bit but if they ban gay priests then they could be causing an even bigger problem in terms of the numbers joining up. I can think of a lot of priests that would be giving up the collar if they were banned altogether!

I wonder if they have invented a test yet? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Catholic Church has had a theological problem with being gay for a long time. They can&#8217;t come out and say that to be a homosexual is wrong as they preach that God makes us who we are. Therefore, if you are gay then God made you that way. I always thought they got around this issue by saying that gay sex was immoral. As with heterosexuality any sex outside marriage is a no-no so as gays can&#8217;t get married then they&#8217;re are fornicating and damned to hell. This meant they had the moral high ground without comprimising themselves and not appearing homophobic or whatever. This edict doesn&#8217;t make sense in what it says but the reason why it has been released is equally bizarre.</p>
<p>I might be stirring the pot a bit but if they ban gay priests then they could be causing an even bigger problem in terms of the numbers joining up. I can think of a lot of priests that would be giving up the collar if they were banned altogether!</p>
<p>I wonder if they have invented a test yet? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpshewan</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/29/more-catholic-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-6484</link>
		<dc:creator>gpshewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/29/more-catholic-nonsense/#comment-6484</guid>
		<description>I was going to write about it this morning ... but I can&#039;t be bothered.

You missed the best bit.  It doesn&#039;t actually say &quot;If you&#039;re gay&quot; which would be pretty black and white ... but uses the wonderful phrase &quot;Gay tendencies&quot;.  So if I thought that Sean Connery cut a fine figure of a man in his early Bond years then I couldn&#039;t possibly be a priest?  I am now going to tease my younger brother when he&#039;s late for lunch because he&#039;s spent too long primping and preening (*cough* can&#039;t deal with getting older ... early mid-life crisis *cough*) by telling him he&#039;d never make a priest.  Which will confuse him no end but I&#039;ll sit and chortle thinking &quot;I&#039;ve just accused you of having gay tendencies mate&quot;.

The interview process would indeed be hysterical:

&quot;Gay?  Fancy men?  Worn out yer copy of &#039;Top Gun&#039; lad?&quot;
&quot;Nah, I&#039;m not gay!&quot;
&quot;Bit defensive there lad.  A bit uncomfortable with your sexuality are you?&quot;
&quot;Phf! Naw not at all.  I moisturise&quot;
&quot;AHA! Gay Boy!&quot;
&quot;Non-scented ... Nivea for Men only&quot;
&quot;Dammit&quot;
&quot;There was that one time at the Rugby club five years ago, but I&#039;ve shifted loadsa women since then&quot;
&quot;Didn&#039;t marry of them did ya?&quot;
&quot;Nope&quot;
&quot;Yer in&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to write about it this morning &#8230; but I can&#8217;t be bothered.</p>
<p>You missed the best bit.  It doesn&#8217;t actually say &#8220;If you&#8217;re gay&#8221; which would be pretty black and white &#8230; but uses the wonderful phrase &#8220;Gay tendencies&#8221;.  So if I thought that Sean Connery cut a fine figure of a man in his early Bond years then I couldn&#8217;t possibly be a priest?  I am now going to tease my younger brother when he&#8217;s late for lunch because he&#8217;s spent too long primping and preening (*cough* can&#8217;t deal with getting older &#8230; early mid-life crisis *cough*) by telling him he&#8217;d never make a priest.  Which will confuse him no end but I&#8217;ll sit and chortle thinking &#8220;I&#8217;ve just accused you of having gay tendencies mate&#8221;.</p>
<p>The interview process would indeed be hysterical:</p>
<p>&#8220;Gay?  Fancy men?  Worn out yer copy of &#8216;Top Gun&#8217; lad?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Nah, I&#8217;m not gay!&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Bit defensive there lad.  A bit uncomfortable with your sexuality are you?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Phf! Naw not at all.  I moisturise&#8221;<br />
&#8220;AHA! Gay Boy!&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Non-scented &#8230; Nivea for Men only&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Dammit&#8221;<br />
&#8220;There was that one time at the Rugby club five years ago, but I&#8217;ve shifted loadsa women since then&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Didn&#8217;t marry of them did ya?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Nope&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Yer in&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
