<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: alpha &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/</link>
	<description>Eclectic.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-almost-beta</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6356</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6356</guid>
		<description>Craig - I should restate - most of the changes seem to be related to the front end. Especially the admin interface. Feel free to correct me, I know there are some plugin and template differences too, but they seem minor.

The core code is still slow and, without caching, easy to overload. The searching is still godawful. There are so many useful improvments that need to be made but are pushed aside.

One of the things I want to do is just go through the WP code and play devils advocate: why is this here? Can it run any faster? Why the hell are there so many includes? etc etc. 

The reason I'm critical of it is because I like it, and want it to be good, overall the 2.0 release is disapointing. If it wasn't free software then I wouldn't be upgrading. But it is, and I can make a difference. So maybe it's up to me (and everyone else)? Because it's really not flying with me atm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig - I should restate - most of the changes seem to be related to the front end. Especially the admin interface. Feel free to correct me, I know there are some plugin and template differences too, but they seem minor.</p>
<p>The core code is still slow and, without caching, easy to overload. The searching is still godawful. There are so many useful improvments that need to be made but are pushed aside.</p>
<p>One of the things I want to do is just go through the WP code and play devils advocate: why is this here? Can it run any faster? Why the hell are there so many includes? etc etc. </p>
<p>The reason I&#8217;m critical of it is because I like it, and want it to be good, overall the 2.0 release is disapointing. If it wasn&#8217;t free software then I wouldn&#8217;t be upgrading. But it is, and I can make a difference. So maybe it&#8217;s up to me (and everyone else)? Because it&#8217;s really not flying with me atm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6335</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6335</guid>
		<description>You don't think they jumped to 2 because TXP decided to start at 4 do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t think they jumped to 2 because TXP decided to start at 4 do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6329</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6329</guid>
		<description>I still cannot find - as yet - a compelling reason to upgrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still cannot find - as yet - a compelling reason to upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6328</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6328</guid>
		<description>Most of the changes are cosmetic? Huh? :^)

I'm running with it on my Area51 site. Had a slight bump during the upgrade, but it seems to have sorted itself out. It's a much better backend, to be sure.

Askismet is also included as a default plugin, although you still need to get an API key to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the changes are cosmetic? Huh? :^)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running with it on my Area51 site. Had a slight bump during the upgrade, but it seems to have sorted itself out. It&#8217;s a much better backend, to be sure.</p>
<p>Askismet is also included as a default plugin, although you still need to get an API key to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ch0de's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6327</link>
		<dc:creator>ch0de's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6327</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wordpress 2.0 Beta 1 Released&lt;/strong&gt;

	I&#8217;m so happy to announce that Wordpress 2.0 Beta 1 has been released. 
	It is a BETA release.
It is pre-release software, which means that you will run into bugs while using it. If youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re not comfortable using unfinished software, please wait ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wordpress 2.0 Beta 1 Released</strong></p>
<p>	I&#8217;m so happy to announce that Wordpress 2.0 Beta 1 has been released.<br />
	It is a BETA release.<br />
It is pre-release software, which means that you will run into bugs while using it. If youÃ¢â‚¬â„¢re not comfortable using unfinished software, please wait &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6325</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6325</guid>
		<description>*sigh*

But it's not really a 2.0. I knew that it would be version jumped. Oh well. I'd have put it at a 1.7 or so. There are some great under the hood changes but most of the changes are cosmetic.. at least in scope.

I guess it'll get more publicity for the larger leap though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*sigh*</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not really a 2.0. I knew that it would be version jumped. Oh well. I&#8217;d have put it at a 1.7 or so. There are some great under the hood changes but most of the changes are cosmetic.. at least in scope.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;ll get more publicity for the larger leap though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tangled up in Purple &#187; Better Get It?</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6322</link>
		<dc:creator>Tangled up in Purple &#187; Better Get It?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6322</guid>
		<description>[...] I discovered that Wordpress 2.0 Beta was available for download for those brave enough for a challenge. So I got it and created a new database. The result is here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I discovered that Wordpress 2.0 Beta was available for download for those brave enough for a challenge. So I got it and created a new database. The result is here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet Wordpress</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6321</link>
		<dc:creator>Planet Wordpress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 06:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6321</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Update: I received word that several people posted about the beta before I did. But none of them offered nearly as much useful information about it. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Update: I received word that several people posted about the beta before I did. But none of them offered nearly as much useful information about it. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the life of justin moore &#187; WordPress 2.0 Beta 1</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6320</link>
		<dc:creator>the life of justin moore &#187; WordPress 2.0 Beta 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6320</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s being reported by several folks now that WordPress 2.0 has hit Beta 1. PhotoMatt made the official announcement earlier this evening on the wp-testers list. I suspected back in August that the WP team would &#8220;jump&#8221; to v2.0 instead of having 1.6 be the next release. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s being reported by several folks now that WordPress 2.0 has hit Beta 1. PhotoMatt made the official announcement earlier this evening on the wp-testers list. I suspected back in August that the WP team would &#8220;jump&#8221; to v2.0 instead of having 1.6 be the next release. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron aka desk003</title>
		<link>http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6319</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron aka desk003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/11/19/alpha/#comment-6319</guid>
		<description>What?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
