Comments on: Dear Bird Flu Monitor Splog … http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/ Eclectic. Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:33:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-almost-beta hourly 1 By: Ballpoint Wren » Apologies to RSS readers http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5952 Ballpoint Wren » Apologies to RSS readers Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:03:59 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5952 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] I had an issue with a blog aggregator that made me realize I don't want to give full content to my RSS feed, not even with Angusman's copyright plugin. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] I had an issue with a blog aggregator that made me realize I don’t want to give full content to my RSS feed, not even with Angusman’s copyright plugin. [...]

]]> By: peter http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5927 peter Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:07:01 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5927 Got it. Got it.

]]> By: Mark http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5926 Mark Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:59:03 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5926 True. But no linkage from here :) True.
But no linkage from here :)

]]> By: peter http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5925 peter Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:54:29 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5925 And Mark, links are free. And Mark, links are free.

]]> By: peter http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5924 peter Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:45:58 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5924 Sorry, Bonnie and Mark. I was too confused about the names. 1. have removed the "Continue reading" link. Had never seen this problem from your point of you before, but I agree with you. 2. removed ad below article I love my work and won't stop it until leaving this place into the forest. By the way, compiled topic maps are part of own content. Sorry, Bonnie and Mark. I was too confused about the names.
1. have removed the “Continue reading” link. Had never seen this problem from your point of you before, but I agree with you.
2. removed ad below article
I love my work and won’t stop it until leaving this place into the forest.

By the way, compiled topic maps are part of own content.

]]> By: Mark http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5920 Mark Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:04:00 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5920 <blockquote>Get out of the aggregating business. Write your own content. And don't ever, EVER use other people's content without their permission.</blockquote> What Bonnie said. Regardless of fair use, you are using other people work to create a site. Pay me and you are welcome - I charge $2.50 per link back to me. The button is on the right.

Get out of the aggregating business. Write your own content. And don’t ever, EVER use other people’s content without their permission.

What Bonnie said.

Regardless of fair use, you are using other people work to create a site. Pay me and you are welcome - I charge $2.50 per link back to me. The button is on the right.

]]> By: Bonnie http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5919 Bonnie Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:56:13 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5919 Peter, I am <a href="http://www.bonniewren.com">BONNIE</a>, the owner of <a href="http://www.bonniewren.com">Ballpoint Wren.</a> I am not Mark, who is the owner of <a href="http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2">What Makes You Happy?</a> I believe he was clear in that he wanted nothing to do with you. I am talking about your "continue reading" links. The link there right now is a fraud. It does not take the reader to my site, but deeper into your site, with your ads. Bait and switch. How can you solve this problem? Get out of the aggregating business. Write your own content. And don't ever, EVER use other people's content without their permission. And Peter? You are using my content without my permission. Peter, I am BONNIE, the owner of Ballpoint Wren.

I am not Mark, who is the owner of What Makes You Happy? I believe he was clear in that he wanted nothing to do with you.

I am talking about your “continue reading” links. The link there right now is a fraud. It does not take the reader to my site, but deeper into your site, with your ads. Bait and switch.

How can you solve this problem?

Get out of the aggregating business. Write your own content. And don’t ever, EVER use other people’s content without their permission.

And Peter? You are using my content without my permission.

]]> By: peter http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5918 peter Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:44:40 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5918 Aye, thank you, now I now. Well, the quote is full attributed und starts with a link to your site titled [What makes you happy?]. Its part of the freedoch of speech to post quotations together with context, if the author gets full attributation and you add more than nonsense. Thats my understanding of law and commons policies. We give accept the authors right of cancellation, she can unsubscribe from the blog, just by dropping a note, email or comment. Second, I followed your suggestion and removed the ad located between quotations and comments. The intention is to let the content rule and to distance myself from splog methods. I agree with the idea, that a visitor expects to get to the original post when clicking on the title. How could I solve this problem? Hide the articles with related posts? Or may just link the date-string the title link goes to the original site? I don't know, have to think about it. Aye, thank you, now I now. Well, the quote is full attributed und starts with a link to your site titled [What makes you happy?]. Its part of the freedoch of speech to post quotations together with context, if the author gets full attributation and you add more than nonsense. Thats my understanding of law and commons policies. We give accept the authors right of cancellation, she can unsubscribe from the blog, just by dropping a note, email or comment.

Second, I followed your suggestion and removed the ad located between quotations and comments. The intention is to let the content rule and to distance myself from splog methods.

I agree with the idea, that a visitor expects to get to the original post when clicking on the title. How could I solve this problem? Hide the articles with related posts? Or may just link the date-string the title link goes to the original site? I don’t know, have to think about it.

]]> By: Bonnie http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5917 Bonnie Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:28:07 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5917 Peter, please stay focused here. As I said, when people click on your link to my article, they do not go to my site. They go to a bunch of other articles and your ads. How is this not stealing? You do not reimburse authors like me, just use us to drive traffic to your site. That is wrong, Peter. It's stealing. Peter, please stay focused here.

As I said, when people click on your link to my article, they do not go to my site. They go to a bunch of other articles and your ads. How is this not stealing?

You do not reimburse authors like me, just use us to drive traffic to your site. That is wrong, Peter. It’s stealing.

]]> By: peter http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5915 peter Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:04:33 +0000 http://www.tamba2.org.uk/T2/archives/2005/10/19/dear-bird-flu-monitor-splog/#comment-5915 Thanks Bonnie, for replying me. From your point of view, you're absolutely right. Without having qualified sources its hard to blog. If more people would say keep Technorati and Google outside, which are tracking and monetizing their posts, the web would be less exciting. You are one of the friends of human build web, right? In some things of web culture I may feel like you. On the other hand I am proud to have been building batch scripts assisting me with the editors work. I think we should explore the new possibilities of aggregated webs, because they are useful. You can sort and weight many kind of sources, mapping the most valued voices for topics of content. And thats useful for readers and for bloggers looking for an audience. Thanks Bonnie, for replying me. From your point of view, you’re absolutely right. Without having qualified sources its hard to blog. If more people would say keep Technorati and Google outside, which are tracking and monetizing their posts, the web would be less exciting. You are one of the friends of human build web, right? In some things of web culture I may feel like you. On the other hand I am proud to have been building batch scripts assisting me with the editors work. I think we should explore the new possibilities of aggregated webs, because they are useful. You can sort and weight many kind of sources, mapping the most valued voices for topics of content. And thats useful for readers and for bloggers looking for an audience.

]]>